Always on His Mind - Fraud By Omission (±x)
Enter more text here
As part of the 12/17 Fraud Edward de Saram (“EDS”) went around making disparaging remarks to all and sundry in order to fabricate a position that did not exist, and one which he would subsequently rely upon.
Here is a call between EDS and Rienzie Arseculeratne, Presidents Counsel and my lawyer, and someone who was very fond of me, and who has known me for 45 years…
20151219 173018 Excerpt 03
RZA – “Right, right.“
EDS – “Because all this house… we took photographs… but [Joe] is saying that people have come and put lights on… despite him locking all the doors… [Joe has all the keys] so it’s all in his mind.“
* * EDS CONFIRMED THAT I WAS IMAGINING PEOPLE COMING INTO THE HOUSE, AND IT IS HIS WORD AGAINST MINE. WHY SHOULD HE BE BELIEVED OVER ME? * *
20151219 173018 Excerpt 04
RZA – “Right, right.“
EDS – “So [Joe] was being brainwashed [by Chamaree Silva] into believing, and any small signal he believes it, in his delusional system.“
* * WOW THANK GOD THAT I DID NOT HAVE A REAL PROBLEM BECAUSE THE UNADULTERATED MALICE THAT EDS DEMONSTRATES TRULY DOES CONFIRM THAT HE WAS HELLBENT ON TEACHING ME A LESSON WITH ECT.
I LOVE THE WAY EDS IS ABLE TO DETERMINE EVERYONE’S STATE OF MIND AS FACT, EVEN THOUGH IT IS IMPOSSIBLE IN LAW. * *
Auditory and Visual Hallucinations
* * OBVIOUSLY IT IS NOT A HALLUCINATION IF THERE IS VOLUMINOUS FORENSIC EVIDENCE RELATING TO THE 12/17 FRAUD, WHICH CAN BE ANALYSED 650 DAYS...
So the doors of the house are ‘locked but Joe is stating that people are coming in’… How can this be possible? Bearing in mind the above two excerpts are from 19 December 2015…
* * LISTEN TO THIS FROM 6 DAYS EARLIER * *
GXP – “Has he, did [Joe] make up with that driver.“
EDS – “No, no, no… his mental situation I think he is aggressive towards the driver as well.“
* * JUST KEEP REPEATING THE SAME LIES, AND SOMEONE WILL EVENTUALLY BELIEVE EDS * *
GXP – “Right, right“
EDS – “[Driver] was exploiting us as well… [driver] has taken a lot of money Gaya…“
* * OH RIGHT, SO PERHAPS JOE WAS RIGHT RATHER THAN SOMEONE WHO HAS RIPPED EDS OFF * *
GXP – “From that bloody driver?“
EDS – “Yes, that [Driver] told us many many lies… that he was getting LKR 65,000… Joe was going to give LKR 1.5 million to start with and he starts the job he was going to get LKR 130,000 a month.“
* * SO IF THE DRIVER HAS BEEN LYING, WHY DOES EDS BELIEVE THE DRIVER OVER ME? – BECAUSE EDS HAS BEEN CONSPIRING WITH THE DRIVER AND OTHERS – I HAVE THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE OBVIOUSLY * *
GXP – “Right, okay.“
EDS – “Unknown to Joe, I have given [driver] around LKR 2.2 million.“
GXP – “Actually? My heavens. So?“
EDS – “No, 500, I have given LKR 1.3 million… without Joe knowing.“
* * CLASSIC BRIBERY – UK EXTRA-TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION * *
Bribery Act 2010: Joint Prosecution Guidance of The Director of the Serious Fraud Office and The Director of Public Prosecutions
The legal guidance on the Bribery Act 2010 is joint CPS and SFO guidance for prosecutors on the legal elements of the offences of bribery and the public interest factors to be taken into account when considering whether a prosecution is in the public...
* * YES IT IS ALWAYS ‘UNKNOWN TO JOE’ BUT SEE HOW JOE KNOWS EVERYTHING – HA HA * *
GXP – “Oh right.“
EDS – “And the other thing is that [driver] has not got the letter of discharge from the army, and Joe is saying that he has not even left the army.“
* * EDS SHOULD HAVE LISTENED TO ME INSTEAD OF BRIBING PEOPLE * *
GXP – “Hmm, hmm.“
EDS – “Therefore, initially [driver] was appearing very loyal.“
GXP – “Correct, correct, correct.“
EDS – “[Driver] was also a little bit greedy and money-orientated… and WHEN HE LEFT HE HAS ALSO TAKEN THE HOUSE-KEYS AS WELL.“
GXP – “Really?“
EDS – “Yes… I just phoned [driver] up because I wanted to speak to him… [driver] has taken credit cards and taken a lot of stuff.“
GXP – “My God.“
EDS – “At that time it was in a situation where he had to go, BUT [DRIVER] SHOULD HAVE LEFT ALL THE KEYS.“
GXP – “Yes of course.“
On 13 December 2015 EDS confirmed that the driver has taken a set of the house keys in his conversation with Gaya Pathikirikorale, a UK Citizen. EDS also confirms that the driver has taken a lot of money, credit cards and of course EDS has done something underhand by bribing the driver – Bribery is actually an Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction Criminal Offence in the UK.
Keys are used to open doors that are locked in case there are any people wondering 🙂
On 19 December 2015 EDS has deceived my lawyer Rienzie by saying that ‘Joe is imagining things because the doors are locked from the inside.’ and using that are a basis to have me sectioned and to say that I have a psychiatric problem – I wonder if anyone in the UK has seen a UK citizen run such a psychiatric fraud as EDS’?
EDS has deliberately OMITTED THE OBVIOUSLY RELEVANT fact that
(a) A set of my house keys was actually in the possession of a third party, who could easily use those keys to get into the house – my life was deliberately put in danger by EDS.
(b) Of course EDS did not tell me about the fact that he knew from 06 December 2015 and he did not disclose that relevant fact when it was relevant!!
(c) EDS was waiting for those parties to attack me, or kill Shihara the Owl Cat, or if we survived those (which we did) my description of that issue would then be used to section me on the basis of hallucination and EDS’ psychiatric fraud!![still writing this and uploading evidence]
Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)