GCHQ and a Neverending Storey (±x)
Enter more text here
“A Chess Master who claims that he was turned down for a job at a British secret intelligence agency because of his “loyalty to God” has lost his claim for discrimination.
Charlie Storey, a chess Grand Master, applied to the British secret intelligence agency GCHQ for a post as an Information Assurance and Network Defence Specialist in July 2008, a post which required he highest level of security clearance. After his application he underwent a rigorous interview process. He was successful in his initial interview in 2008 and was informed that his application was ready to progress to the next stage. He was also informed, however, that a “firm offer” of appointment would be subject to enquiries by GCHQ into his health, security, and administrative matters.
As part of the enquiries into his background his GP sent GCHQ a record of his past medical history and treatment, which stated that Mr Storey had suffered from drug-induced psychosis in 1991, with further episodes of anxiety and paranoia in 2001 and 2003. Mr Storey’s GP also noted, however, that the incident of psychosis was of no relevance to the application as it occurred over 17 years ago.
However, despite this a consultant forensic psychologist instructed by GCHQ stated that he had concerns about Mr Storey’s health which may render Mr Storey unfit to work for the organisation. Mr Storey was informed by GCHQ that the consultant psychologist had assessed him as an unsuitable candidate but that GCHQ was prepared to reconsider his rejection if he was willing to undergo further enquiries into his health and security matters. Mr Storey therefore chose to do so.”
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
This is the case – http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2015/0269_14_2210.html and a key area of it is this section:-
9. In December 2008 Dr L, a Consultant Clinical and Forensic Psychologist for GCHQ, was asked to consider the information which the Claimant had provided and gave an opinion as to whether he was suitable for DV security clearance. Dr L prepared a first written report without seeing the Claimant. It referred to the background provided by the GP and to the good prognosis provided recreational drugs were avoided in future. Dr L’s report set out an opinion and a summary of risks and vulnerabilities based on the medical material and information provided by the Claimant.
10. The gist of Dr L’s first report, provided to the Claimant was as follows:
· Mr Storey was vulnerable to experiencing psychotic symptoms which could result in behaviours which would have implications for the risk to the organisation.
· Mr Storey was vulnerable to developing anxiety symptoms which might render him unavailable for work for extended periods.
· There were concerns about the reliability of Mr Storey’s accounts.
· “There were concerns that Mr Storey was lacking an insight into mental health problems.”
Unless I have been poisoned I have no symptoms of either ‘psychotic symptoms’ or ‘anxiety symptoms’. I have never had any ‘lack of insight into mental health problems’.
In Charlie’s case, are the ‘concerns’ of Dr L manifested as ‘facts’ which can be relied upon?
Please refer to this article as well, which explains the inter-relation of Law Enforcement and GCHQ at the EXACT time period that these ridiculous issues against me were occurring:-
Fork Movements and GCHQ
What is a Fork Movement? In chess, a fork is a tactic whereby a single piece makes two or more direct attacks simultaneously. Most commonly two pieces...
I will start with this ‘lack of insight‘ nonsense first – this is some garbage that my parents made up, obviously under the instructions of a third party – the party associated with the covert electronic surveillance obviously!
From March 1972 to November 2015 neither EDS and PDS had ever used that phrase to describe me, or anything I did.
Yet when they had turned up in December 2015 it was a phrase that they essentially tried to slot into every disparaging conversation that they made about me.[insert evidence]
It is clearly fraudulent, and to fabricate a situation in which ‘someone has an illness but does not know‘, so others have to make decisions for them, is nothing short of heinous.
If they had simply left me alone instead of trying to assist their associates evade criminal culpability then things would have been considerably easier all-round, and they would not be facing charges of attempted murder, perverting the course of justice and fraud.
In the case of Charlie Storey, his ‘drug-induced psychosis’ was self-initiated. In my case, it lasted about a week and EDS induced it, meaning factors completely beyond my control and which I cannot be blamed for.
Substance-Induced Mental Disorders
Background As I wrote in the following article, Edward de Saram obtained and poisoned me with psychotropic medication that 'conveniently' fabricated...
In relation to Charlie’s ‘paranoia’
“a state of mind is impossible to determine as fact, but an inference as to that state can be drawn from the relevant facts.”
Facts are NOT the same as opinion and in Asia people cannot tell the difference between their dim opinions and facts in any event.
Psychiatrists rely on OPINION ONLY, as
“there are NO quantitative tests for major psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia.”
If I have forensic evidence of covert electronic surveillance then those are facts, which immediately quash any apparent ‘concerns’ over my state of mind,
AND I DON’T HAVE PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA, OBVIOUSLY
I am sure my peers in the AU Australian Signals Directorate ("ASD"), UK Government Communications Headquarters ("GCHQ") and US Central Intelligence...
Every time I discover the activity of intelligence agencies, I get called paranoid:-
Just Because You're Paranoid
Summary This article is about blatant Fundamental Human Rights violations. It centres around my absolutely correct identification of MI5 overseeing...
How I Met Big Brother - GeniusJoe v MI5
The UK Surveillance State The above video confirms the UK's obsession with electronic surveillance and human rights violations in the present. The...
* * EVIDENCE IS UPLOADING – PLEASE CHECK BACK LATER * *
The case continues…
Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)