Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat II - Shutting the Door on a Pseudo-Defence
Enter more text here
Following on from this article:-
Psychiatric Fraud - Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Part 1
Ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not" and "ignorance of law excuses no one"...
I discuss the two types of pseudo-defences that Edward de Saram (“EDS”) was attempting to run, the existence of which are both confirmed yet both quashed by EDS’ own recordings.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO SHUT THAT DEFENCE DOOR PERMANENTLY 🙂
Conversation between Newton Ranasinghe (“NR”) and EDS 20151212 – Excerpt
EDS – “The thing is this to formalise [things in relation to Sectioning], there is some legislation going through parliament, but at the moment there isn’t anything like Section 2, Section 3.”
[WHAT EDS IS CONFIRMING IS THAT THERE IS A MENTAL HEALTH ACT BUT ASPECTS OF INVOLUNTARY ADMISSION/SECTIONING IS NOT AVAILABLE.
AS IT HAPPENS THERE WAS NO BILL GOING THROUGH PARLIAMENT, WHICH IS ANOTHER OF EDS’ LIES. NOTHING IMMINENT WAS OCCURRING.]
Ignorance of the Law CAN be a Defence in a Unique Situation
But considering EDS’ lies (at [two-faced] value), should the bill have been passed into law and was NEWLY OPERATIONAL, then he would have a realistic defence in simply ‘not knowing about it’ – in this very unique situation.
“The doctrine assumes that the law in question has been properly promulgated—published and distributed, for example, by being printed in a government gazette, made available over the internet, or printed in volumes available for sale to the public at affordable prices. In the ancient phrase of Gratian, Leges instituuntur cum promulgantur (“Laws are instituted when they are promulgated”).
In order that a law obtain the binding force which is proper to a law, it must be applied to the men who have to be ruled by it. Such application is made by their being given notice by promulgation. A law can bind only when it is reasonably possible for those to whom it applies to acquire knowledge of it in order to observe it, even if actual knowledge of the law is absent for a particular individual. A secret law is no law at all.”
Given the fact that the Mental Diseases Ordinance was 27 of 1956, if we take 01 January 1957 as the date of enactment then the numbers of day elapsed since enactment to 01 December 2015 is
21518 days (over 58yrs)
As such that defence is obviously unavailable 🙂
(B1) Regulatory Officials
In criminal law, although ignorance may not clear a defendant of guilt, it can be a consideration in sentencing, particularly where the law is unclear and therefore the defendant sought advice from law enforcement or regulatory officials.
Unfortunately this does not apply to EDS because THE LAW IS CRYSTAL CLEAR and other Medical Professionals do not come under the heading of ‘regulatory officials’ or ‘law enforcement’. A lawyer is a step in the right direction however…
Unless of course EDS wants to assert that his rights came from his acting in the capacity of an agent of law enforcement, a UK Covert Human Intelligence Source (“C.H.I.S.”) which will then expose his law enforcement handlers to criminal liability for EDS’ infliction of criminal injuries torture upon me and perversion of the course of justice on 17 December 2015 and onwards! BOOYAH!
(B2) Legal Professionals who Actually Know the Legal Position Clearly
RA – “Yeah, yeah.”
EDS – “So, the problem here is when he is refusing to come to hospital… whether there is any procedure where people can go and enter his house and take him to hospital… there’s probably something like that here?”
RA – “That you cannot do.”
EDS – “What?”
RA – “A SYSTEM OF TAKING SOMEONE FORCIBLY DOES NOT EXIST IN SRI LANKA.”
[RIENZIE ARSECULERATNE IS QUITE RIGHT – THERE IS NO SYSTEM. AND EDS ALSO KNOWS FROM HIS OWN CALL ABOVE WITH NR, THAT THERE IS ‘NO SECTION 2, SECTION 3 RELATING TO INVOLUNTARY ADMISSION]
After RA confirmed to EDS that ‘there was no system in Sri Lanka’, EDS is trying tp convince him otherwise…
EDS – “Rienzie, a psychiatrist told me that in the Ministry of Health there is an approved scheme.”
RA – “I can ask, I can easily enquire whether there is such a scheme from the Ministry of Health… I know certain people there.”
EDS – “Yeah.”
RA – “In fact one or two of them were with me yesterday night also… I can ask them.”
EDS – “I’m going to see a doctor today, in the afternoon, I will ask him as well. Now the doctor who told me, one of the psychiatrists, said you know you can phone up that team, they will come and take [Joe] to hospital, but they can only take him to certain hospital.”
[AS IS PATENTLY OBVIOUS EDS SEEMS TO THINK THAT A ‘METHOD OF TRANSPORTATION’ (THE APPROVED SCHEME, IF IT EVEN EXISTS) SOMEHOW MEANS AND/OR TRUMPS ENACTED LEGISLATION.
NOTE HOW EDS ASKED RA WITHOUT DISCLOSING THAT HE WAS ALREADY AWARE OF SOME SCHEME – BUT THE FACTS ARE EDS WOULD NOT BE ASKING IF THERE WAS ANYTHING CLOSE TO ENACTED LEGISLATION.
THIS EASILY CONFIRMS THE PREMEDITATION ASPECT OF THE CRIME – THIS IS FOUR DAYS BEFORE 17 DECEMBER 2015]
EDS – “And then go to the police and put an entry, THEN THE GUARDIAN HAS TO SIGN.”
RA – “Yeah.”
EDS – “And it can be done that way.”
[EDS HAS CONFIRMED IS THAT HE CAN FRAUDULENTLY TAKE MY LEGAL RIGHTS AWAY VIA HIM BEING MY LEGAL GUARDIAN AND CAN THEN DO WHAT HE LIKES 🙂
WELL THAT’S A SAD FRAUD TO PREVENT ME CHALLENGING SEARCH & SEIZURES VIA INTERLOCUTORIES :)]
The relevant parts of the call are:-
EDS – “So that being the case can you contact the Ministry of Health… then find out what can be done…”
RA – “I’ll find out, I’ll ring my friend and find out.”
EDS – “Yeah thank you… find out without giving too much information.”
[SURELY TO MAKE THE CORRECT DETERMINATION A PERSON NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL AND FRANK DISCLOSURE OF THE EXACT SCENARIO – OTHERWISE THE RESULT ANSWER WILL PROBABLY BE CORRECT.
THIS MIRRORS EDS GOING AROUND DESCRIBING SYMPTOMS THAT HE HAS FABRICATED AND/OR ARE SUBSTANCE-INDUCED AND TICKING ALL THE BOXES.]
RA – “No, no, I won’t need information, I can give the situation and find out.”
EDS – “Thank you very much Rienzie.”
RA – “You’re welcome Ranjit, okay?”
[GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE NEXT CALL BETWEEN RA AND EDS OCCURRED ON 19 DECEMBER 2015, IT IS CLEAR THAT EDS COULD NOT BE BOTHERED WAITING FOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE THE AGGRAVATED KIDNAP]
Per Legem Terrae - Perversion of the Course of Justice via Political Psychiatry
20171026 UPDATE Under a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request, it is IMPERATIVE that ALL ACTIONS performed in the target country FULLY COMPLIES with...
(B3) Other Medical Professionals
EDS – “We need to go with that option so that we can go forward.”
NR – “Yes… I’m glad that you are seeing him tomorrow. After that give me a call – SOMETIMES THEY ARE SAYING FROM HERE (UK) [THE POLICE] WILL SEND A TEAM. Then you have to get a Magistrate’s Order.“
[THIS IS VERY INTERESTING – NOTWITHSTANDING THE FACT THAT NR CONFIRMS THAT THE UK POLICE ‘APPEARS’ TO BE INTERESTED IN EXTRADITION, IN PARALLEL THEY ARE RUNNING WHAT IS OBVIOUSLY AN EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION!! I WILL EXPAND ON THIS IN DUE COURSE AND HAMMER THE ‘CHILDREN IN BLUE’ 🙂
My article discussed the concept of a Restricted Patient:-
The Restricted Patient
One of my favourite films, and even this as a Spying / Military Theme can you believe? Ha ha] What is a Restricted Patient Restricted patients are...
“Restricted patients are persons detained in hospital under a compulsion order with a restriction order. They have usually committed an offence punishable by imprisonment but as a result of mental disorder are not imprisoned but ordered to be detained in hospital for treatment, without limit of time.”
The Bottom Line in relation to Forcible Removal of Joe
THE LAW IS CRYSTAL CLEAR and EDS had been told by a President’s Counsel (equivalent to a QC) FOUR DAYS BEFORE, that what EDS is proposing is UNLAWFUL – as such Aggravated Damages and a Longer Sentence for EDS is on the cards 🙂
This VERY INTERESTING case continues…
Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)