Kidnapping and Unlawful Imprisonment


Kidnapping and Unlawful Imprisonment (±x)

Published on 6th May 2017

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM

Enter more text here

still working on this one please check back later

In criminal law, kidnapping is the abduction and restraint by force or unlawful transportation of a person usually in order to hold them captive against their will.

This may be done with a demand for ransom in exchange for releasing them from concealment, or for other illegal purposes such as destroying the victim’s legal and accounting materials and forensic evidence against the very perpetrators themselves.

Kidnapping can be accompanied by bodily injury which elevates the crime to aggravated kidnapping, and this is particularly so in my case in which Edward de Saram knew that I was suffering from a serious neck injury from the [staged] road traffic accident.

Common Law Offence

Kidnapping is an offence under the common law of England and Wales.

Lord Brandon said in 1984 R v D:-

“First, the nature of the offence is an attack on, and infringement of, the personal liberty of an individual.

Secondly, the offence contains four ingredients as follows:

(1) the taking or carrying away of one person by another;

(2) by force or fraud;

(3) without the consent of the person so taken or carried away; and

(4) without lawful excuse.”

EDS obviously thought that he was ‘a bit clever’ by talking about the ‘laws of the land’ (which would have given a pseudo-defence under (4)) but that was all part of the same sad fraud:-

[insert evidence]

Evidence of Conspiracy and Fraud – PREMEDITATION

I refer to the following excerpts of recorded calls, obtained forensically and entirely lawfully, from the Nokia N8 of Edward de Saram. The whole Psychiatric Issue was a precursor/secondary fraud to the primary fraud of data exfiltration and spoliation of evidence.

EDS asked KSA Perera to go upstairs and delete the call recording. Perera knew very well that I was maintaining all calls to prevent exactly this issue. This is an excerpt focussing on the instruction to delete evidence.

In this follow-up call Perera informed EDS that I wanted Perera to call him, and EDS stated that there should only be one call recording, and lowers his voice saying that I am recording calls. Well it looks to everyone like my concerns about the frauds the pair of them were running, were entirely justified 🙂

Perera asked if I had visited hospital – this is the whole scam about me requiring medication and/or not taking it, was fraudulently started by Margaret Cunniffe and the Melbourne Fraudsters are connected to this entire fraud as usual.

EDS confirmed that I am going to the UK in a few months. EDS drew specific attention to my files and their importance and how only I can look at them and how I need them, or words to that effect. Also Shihara the Owl Cat seemed to be an inconvenience which is why they tried to poison him.

EDS and Perera laughed together about the fact that I suspected them, even though I was spot on in my assessment of the situation in which these clowns were destroying evidence. Did they both ‘forget’ about the calls in which they agreed to delete recordings above?

Not sure why EDS was discussing my health issues with Perera, except to continue to plant the seed that I have a mental problem. Furthermore, it was clear that Perera has taken the keys to my house. So if EDS knew that Perera had the keys then why did he say I was hallucinating when I said that people were coming into my house at night? That is another fraud of EDS.

EDS repeated the theme of me having a mental problem, in the same way that Margaret Cunniffe goes around repeating the same garbage to all and sundry and engages in self-victimisation.

EDS stated that I did not want to see a doctor and/or take medicine. That is not correct – I was happy to see a legitimate doctor without a connection via some old boys club to EDS. Well if I saw a proper UK doctor rather than a co-conspirator then we would get the correct opinion rather than Sri Lankans and their smear campaign!

As can be heard EDS knew very well that I was recovering from a fractured neck and yet still wanted to run his fraud regardless. This is quite sick, and all of course to get me out of the house so evidence could be stolen/planted! Which right-thinking parent would risk a staged event that could increase the risk of transection of my spinal cord?

Malice Aforethought

n. 1) the conscious intent to cause death or great bodily harm to another person before a person commits the crime. Such malice is a required element to prove first degree murder. 2) a general evil and depraved state of mind in which the person is unconcerned for the lives of others.

which also links to Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and Honour Based Violence in:-

As it happened my neck was seriously damaged further as a result of the 12/17 Fraud so the foreseeability of damages against EDS is not in question. The beating caused my neck to crack again and compressed my spinal cord during the assault – I lost power to my upper body so could not even defend myself against the ongoing torture.

EDS stated that because of my knowledge of the law he needed to cover himself, otherwise it would be a problem – well duh if he is planning a spectacular fraud against me that is entirely unlawful and affecting multiple jurisdictions, he should be incredibly careful so he can evade criminal culpability! Obviously in view of the forensic evidence on LinkedIn he was not careful enough 🙂

This is also an excellent example of the phenomenon of ‘Leaking Intent’ in which criminals have the urge to boast about their future crimes.

EDS was defaming me every single time he was talking about a mental situation and repeating this theme to all and sundry does get a little tiring. However EDS confirms that Perera has told a lot of lies and taken a lot of money. Also this confirms EDS’ modus operandi of EDS being a two-faced fraudster and that Perera had the Means/Motive/Opportunity to take my data! Perera was bribed by EDS and that enlivens the UK via Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction

And once again EDS calls me paranoid, because I suspected him and Perera of colluding – once again I simply refer to the two phone calls above which confirms that they are obviously colluding and I am perceptive not paranoid – therefore my assertion was entirely correct. It was obvious when the pair of them were conspiring in front of me in the preceding days!

Even after I had been kidnapped I was getting beaten in the ambulance whilst speaking to my lawyers Peters & Peters because they did not want me to get legal assistance.

still being written


Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM