Per Legem Terrae - Perversion of the Course of Justice via Political Psychiatry (±x)
Enter more text here
Under a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request, it is IMPERATIVE that ALL ACTIONS performed in the target country FULLY COMPLIES with the laws of that country and do NOT infringe FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS.
Here laws mean ENACTED LEGISLATION, not some opinion in relation to a procedure or some other crap designed to DEFEAT MY RIGHTS, which some ShitLankansTM (who are also UK Citizens) have just made up!!
The phrase ‘per legem terrae’, equivalent to ‘by the laws of the land‘, refers to ‘the law in force in a country or region’.
In the year 1215, this term was used in Magna Carta. Perhaps the most famous clause of Magna Carta states:
“No Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land.“
The word ‘disseised’ means ‘to dispossess someone of land or property’. Such as evidentiary material for ongoing legal cases, and forensic evidence 🙂
In 1787, the Continental Congress adopted the Northwest Ordinance for governance of areas in the United States outside of the individual states. Congress wrote: “No man shall be deprived of his liberty or property, but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land.“
Equivalence to Due Process
In 1606, Lord Coke equated this term to due process of law: “But by the Law of the Land. For the true sense and exposition of these words, see the Statute of 37 Edw. 3 cap. 8 where the words, by the law of the Land, are rendered, without due process of Law….“. Justice Powys likewise stated in 1704: “By the 28 Ed. 3.c.3. there the words lex terrae, which are used in Mag. Char. are explained by the words, due process of law; and the meaning of the statute is, that all commitments must be by a legal authority.”
In 1855, the U.S. Supreme Court said, “The words, ‘due process of law,’ were undoubtedly intended to convey the same meaning as the words, ‘by the law of the land,’ in Magna Charta.“
Massachusetts Supreme Court Justice Lemuel Shaw wrote in 1857 that, “Lord Coke himself explains his own meaning by saying ‘the law of the land,’ as expressed in Magna Charta, was intended due process of law, that is, by indictment or presentment of good and lawful men.”
2015 AD – 800 Years Later
I refer now to the 12/17 Fraud involving Edward de Saram (“EDS”) and/or parties associated with Law Enforcement and/or The Melbourne Fraudsters – I have evidence which confirms the link and will upload this shortly.
I am not sure how EDS as a doctor being investigated for Malpractice is suddenly a competent lawyer, but his use of ‘Per Legem Terrae’ [“by the laws of the land”] has really pissed me off given the Fundamental Human Rights violations and loss of my patents and evidence. I dislike justification when it is simply the furtherance of a patently (get it?) obvious fraud.
The summary position is this:-
(a) I had terabytes of evidence in my house that nailed various people in numerous judicial proceedings;
(b) I had terabytes of evidentiary material that I would require in my own defences and/or counterclaims;
(c) During the actual fraud I asked repeatedly what the exact legal basis was, but was not provided with any – there was OBVIOUSLY NO LEGAL BASIS;
(d) I informed my lawyer of my evidentiary material and the obvious risk to its preservation and/or chain, and he confirmed the legal position;
(e) EDS ‘decided’ the basis of ‘Aggravated Kidnapping‘ was the ‘laws of the land‘ – another one of HIS MANY FRAUDS;
(f) Upon returning to my house afterwards, the data had in fact been taken/wiped – this was my concern all along and I was right of course – prescience not paranoia 🙂
Mental Health Act of Sri Lanka
The Mental Disease Ordinance Chapter 559 is the legislation relating to mental health which is based on the concepts and attitudes to mental disorder that prevailed in 1873 when this Law was first enacted. However there was a revision in 1956 as can be seen (“27 of 1956”).
I was unaware that EDS’ Assault / Battery / Kidnapping / Unlawful Imprisonment were alternative instructions for ‘apply in writing to the District Court‘:-
First of all some ‘policeman’ was sent out whilst the others cowered. He was not a legitimate party to the proceeding as I found out later the others thanked him for ‘showing his face’. He was merely brought in to make it look ‘lawful’ – of course it was not.
When I asked them what the issue was they were not interested in providing the reason – this in itself is bizarre as
THERE IS ALWAYS A QUOTABLE LEGAL BASIS FOR A FULLY LAWFUL LEGAL PROCESS.
This behaviour concerned me greatly as well as the fact that EDS was the person behind this issue but was hiding off camera.
Even the body language of the pregnant man in pink when he is saying ‘Money Disruption’ [meaning MONEY LAUNDERING] is that of a child when lying or saying something uncomfortable – note the manner in which his arms swing. The policeman looks down as much as possible either in shame or reluctance to be filmed.
Enhanced Audio track:-
Quick Call to Rienzie Arseculeratne PC for Legal Counsel
I started the conversation by referring to the call interception et cetera that Rienzie knew very well – I had of course consulted him regarding it.
I refer to an event that EDS had forcibly taken me to see a psychiatrist – even though one was not required because of copious amounts of forensic evidence. I had shown EDS and PDS certain evidence before this event as well as describe it in detail.
I thought I saw EDS had a ‘mic’ on the left side of head and he continued to force me to sit on the right side of the trishaw in the journey to and from the hospital as well as to various computer shops along the way. [Actually, I was trying to be too specific. It was NOT a mic but there was a field in EDS’ immediate vicinity. This is addressed in detail here]
I had known EDS for 43yrs at that time and it is easy to tell when he is doing something fraudulent – the other thing he does is drop his voice to a signature whisper 🙂
The concern was my personal security as well as the evidentiary material which NAILS EVERYONE.
Key excerpts are:-
I stated “It seems to be that I have exposed something going on either the UK or here and he is trying to get me sectioned so all the evidence can get wiped.“
Rienzie replied “Oh God“.
I confirmed “The issue is this, I honestly don’t need to be sectioned – the issue is my dad has obviously got himself involved in a mess and now he is trying to get out of the mess by shifting.. my evidence is perfect and it is there and it is video in nature.. and you saw the red zips, and… the parties behind that are trying to get me sectioned so they can go through my house and wipe data – that’s what I think is happening. So this is about the preservation of evidence.“
As I later found I WAS COMPLETELY CORRECT, FROM EDS’ OWN BEHAVIOUR AND ADMISSIONS:-
Destruction of Evidence and Perversion of the Course of Justice
I further confirmed “I don’t know what [the police] have come for… but my dad is there and unfortunately I know if I go with them they will go through my house wiping everything, because the evidence that I’ve got unfortunately incriminates him. I threatened him with court orders yesterday and today, and I didn’t know he was behind this. But the evidence pointed to him, and he has implicated himself.“
I continued “So in that situation I am not going anywhere, especially as I don’t want to be sectioned and I’ve got no representation, I don’t speak Sinhala and my parents are hell-bent on trying to punish me unfortunately. And the UK lawyers, you can see the way I am writing coherent e-mails – there’s nothing wrong with my state of mind whatsoever. It’s just that the parties around me are saying that I am paranoid or sick to try and create an issue for me.“
Rienzie suggested “What if you seal the house and go?” and my response was “No, the problem is that people have been coming in the night, walking around the house and moving things around, that’s another problem I have with security here. I have taken photos… and things have moved around the house – I’ve got all that evidence as well.“
“And I’ve got the evidence of the crimes being committed against me as well, such as the call interception evidence et cetera… When I talk to my dad about these issues he seems to take it personally for some reason… Also my dad is hanging around and trying to get me sectioned.“
Rienzie advised “Just refuse to go.” So I responded “If I refuse to go then they will come back with an arrest warrant presumably if there was an actual crime, is that correct?“
Rienzie responded “We can then fight it out in courts.” to which I replied “Yeah exactly, they come with an arrest warrant and then we can deal with it.“
I responded “I’m just not going with people especially after the recent Chamaree situation where various people dressed as police came, they didn’t take any statements, they didn’t give any id and it was a free-for-all…“
Rienzie correctly responded “Tell them that you just can’t go like that, that there is no reason to go, unless you are arrested and taken, we can file a Fundamental Rights case.“
I finally stated “If we make it a proper legal case, with due process, then we can deal with it in the legal way. This seems to be a bit of a free-for-all, a boys club trying to create issues for me.“
DESPITE THE TRAUMATIC SITUATION I WAS COMPLETELY PRECISE AND SPOT-ON FROM ‘THE LAWS OF THE LAND’ AND FROM SPEAKING WITH RIENZIE. THERE WAS NO SCHIZOPHRENIA HERE, JUST ONE SAD UK/AU/SG FRAUD AGAINST ME!!
This was a confidential call but I have disclosed it because Rienzie had been found to collaborate with the perpetrators – see later on.
I do not bother to honour agreements with those parties who fail to honour their own agreements with me. In any event this is a serious criminal matter relating to Spoliation of Evidence and the state of mind of the perpetrators is relevant. The rules of ‘best evidence’ applies and audio is obviously better than a transcript.
Evidence of Electromagnetic Interference:-
The body language in this video says it all… EDS is the perpetrator and is trying to be the big man among his minions.
I informed them “Okay I spoke to my lawyers and I’m not going anywhere, so that’s the end of that. Can you please leave my property or I will have to ring or notify the police.“
I said ‘ring’ initially but as my calls were continually jammed it would prove to be difficult 🙂
I continued “I’ve already spoken to my lawyers, there is no reason for anything.. I’m not coming down. I’m sorry I don’t speak Sinhala, I don’t speak Sinhala and you’re on my property, could you please leave.”
“Because my father and mother have had some idea to try and get this issue.. I’m not going anywhere.. I’m not opening the door. Will you please leave.“
Pregnant man (“PM”) – “There are two options, you can take your belongings…“
I responded “Just listen. What’s your name?“
PM – “Ekanayake“
JDS “First name, are you a police officer?“
PM – “Yes“
JDS – “I’m not going anywhere.“
PM – “WE WILL COME INSIDE AND TAKE YOU BY FORCE.“
[CLASSIC COERCION – DO WHAT WE SAY OR WE WILL ASSAULT YOU!]
JDS – “ON WHAT BASIS EXACTLY“
PM – “Medical Treatment” (I thought in the first video it was ‘Money Disruption’).
The procedure is to simply APPLY IN WRITING to the District Court and obtain a Court Order – a non-psychopath would have done that. But remember, this BULLSHIT was about MONEY LAUNDERING AND DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE not PSYCHIATRY!!
JDS – “I can say this is my father and mother have come out with some nonsense, right.. there isn’t a single doctor who has actually examined me. Can you please leave.“
EDS – “WE’LL BREAK OPEN THE DOOR AND DRAG YOU OUT“
[MORE COERCION – INFLICTION OF VIOLENCE IF I DO NOT COMPLY WITH AN UNLAWFUL ACT.]
TANIA AND I HAVE HAD THIS CRAP FOR 37 AND 45YRS RESPECTIVELY.
Coercive or controlling behaviour now a crime
JDS – “No, if you do that.. I will file a Fundamental Rights case.“
EDS – “that’s all right“. What we are saying is that you can get your laptop..“
CLASSIC PSYCHOPATHY – CONTINUAL AND BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE LAW
JDS – “I’m not going anywhere, please leave.“
EDS – “Who’s your lawyer?“
JDS – “I’ve already spoken to the lawyers, I’m not going anywhere.”
EDS – “You can file anything… BUT UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY…“
JDS – “I KNOW THE LAWS OF THE COUNTRY I SPOKE TO THE LAWYER JUST NOW.“
[EDS REPEATING ‘LAWS OF THE LAND’ TO TICK THE BOX FOR AN MLAT DOES NOT FOOL ME BECAUSE I KNOW THE ACTUAL ‘LAWS OF THE LAND’]
JDS – “Don’t give me that nonsense, if you open the door I will call the police. Do not open that door.“
HOW MANY TIMES DO I NEED TO TELL THIS RETARD NOT TO OPEN THE DOOR?
EDS – “Break the door!“
JDS – “Do not open that door.“
I called the [real] police but exactly as predicted my call was jammed and it did not connect.
Enhanced Audio Track:-
First and foremost, EDS lowers his voice in traditional fashion when he knows he is doing something fraudulent.
EDS – “I want to discuss something in extreme confidence.. Joe I think is coming for a nervous breakdown.. Now I’m just thinking how I can get him to see a doctor… He seems to be refusing.”
EDS – “Joe shouldn’t have any idea that I had a conversation with you.” – obvious consciousness of guilt.
EDS – “Saturday I was here and I wanted to go and see somebody and he went with me but because he was going to have a long wait he went back.” As anyone can see I went to the doctor but the long wait was the issue not a refusal…
WELL, IF I WENT TO THE DOCTOR AND THERE WAS A LONG WAIT, THEN THAT IS CERTAINLY NOT A REFUSAL TO SEE A DOCTOR!! MORE LIES FROM EDS.
EDS – “Yesterday when I was talking to him he seems very suspicious about people.” – another lie – I was finding the behaviour of EDS and PDS bizarre and they were scheming. However branding me as paranoid because I have correctly identified various frauds electronically against me is not paranoia – it is EDS’ attempt to evade criminal culpability obviously.
EDS – “There are certain things about what he says, it is weird, it is true, but when he is living in this environment of people doing various things, and especially that woman [Chamaree Silva] she has messed up his brain a little bit… he’s very paranoid about things now… He tends to incorporate into his system rather than looking at it.“
THIS IS A TEXTBOOK MILITARY INTELLIGENCE EXCUSE ABOUT ‘INCORPORATING INTO HIS SYSTEM’
This is utter garbage and if Chamaree Silva is the issue then she is one who needs to be treated not me. One of the issues was I was being poisoned and as soon as the poisoner left I was fine. Until that is, EDS came and resumed where she had left off.
EDS – “When he is refusing to come to hospital, what procedure is there to enter the house and take him to hospital, there must be something?“
Rienzie Arseculeratne – “[In this country] you can’t do that… that system of forcibly taking someone to hospital doesn’t exist in Sri Lanka.“
SO THE LAWS OF THE LAND ARE NOT THAT WHICH EDS IS STATING
EDS – “I spoke to a psychiatrist and was told that there is an approved scheme.“
THE SCHEME RELATES TO TRANSPORTATION NOT LEGISLATION. THE ACTUAL COURT ORDER MUST STILL BE OBTAINED OBVIOUSLY!
RA – “I can ask from the Ministry of Health whether there is an approved scheme.“
EDS – “If I go the Police [station] and make an entry then the guardian has to sign… because when he is not prepared to take any medicine and see anyone then he will deteriorate.“
EDS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED MY LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP!!
My health will deteriorate if EDS continues to Intentionally Inflict Emotional Distress by his lack of boundaries and gaslighting antics, and being nasty to me.
EDS’ statements are fraudulent and not even my personality type. I know when I need to take medication and I know when someone is running a Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy fraud on me. And then when people do not understand electronic surveillance to the level that I do then is ‘appears’ to the bystander that I have a problem. All this was part of the fraud and everyone has ignored the ‘inconvenient truth’ of my evidence:-
Brothers in Arms - Human Rights and Electronic Surveillance
EDS – “When it comes to his computer work and various other things he is extremely rational, but if he comes to various aspects he is talking about ‘being got at’ and all that sort of thing and it is difficult to put any sense into him.“
I do not even use words such as ‘being got at’!! I speak in an extremely precise manner.
EDS IS JUST DESCRIBING SYMPTOMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA!
Well if EDS could understand that I have correctly identified electronic harassment surveillance and psychotronic weapons (which comes under the ‘computer work’ that he confirms is ‘extremely rational’) how is he willing to allow a contradiction to arise?
EDS – “He also thinks that I am [involved]. I tend to confront him and say ‘can it be this as well’ and then he doesn’t like it.“
ALSO TEXTBOOK MILITARY INTELLIGENCE – TRYING TO TELL THE VICTIM THAT THERE IS A PLAUSIBLE EXPLANATION.
All that is absolutely nonsense – I have an open mind but I know what electronic surveillance is as I am an expert in this area. EDS is involved, as these and other call recordings confirm. EDS thought he could get away with it and lie but clearly his ‘leaking of intent’ has confirmed consciousness of guilt 🙂
EDS – “So then he must be thinking that I am not listening to him.” – sounds plausible but my personality type is such that I don’t care what fools think – this is just more lies EDS has made up.
RA – “You can always come back to me Ranjit – I am happy to help with this situation…“
EDS – “Keep it confidential between you and me.“
RA – “100% Ranjit don’t worry… I won’t discuss it at all… even when I met you for dinner I have not told any of your people.“
EDS – “That’s good.“
RA – “Nobody in your family knows that I am in touch with you [laughter].“
EDS – “Find out from the [Ministry of Health] then.“
I LOVE THE WAY THESE BABOONS ARE CONGRATULATING THEMSELVES ON THEIR CONSPIRACY AND SECRECY BUT THEY ARE NO MATCH FOR MY ABILITY IN FORENSICS AND CAN THEREFORE LISTEN TO THEIR FRAUD ON LINKEDIN!
Compare and contrast EDS’s behaviour (concealment of crime, nervous laughter) in this recording to:-
As can be seen it is obvious that EDS’ fraud was to (a) intentionally inflict emotional distress (IIED from the early December 2015 trip (b) then tell third parties that I had a mental problem (c) have me sectioned (d) organise ECT to harm me as make it ‘look’ as if there was an ‘issue’ and then (e) take control of my property and assets via legal guardianship so that a deficient search warrant could not be challenged by me and (f) let my enemies get the better of me.
This ‘not taking medicine and having issues’ is the identical theme of the Melbourne Fraudsters in the Supreme Court case so it is obvious where it has come from and why EDS is doing this.
The other problem is that Chamaree told Ray that EDS was nasty to me, and we all know that was on voice record. So EDS had to engage damage limitation, and that has also failed miserably 🙂
Note how this recording is 4 days before the 12/17 event. EDS knew that what he was proposing was unlawful, having been informed of that by a Presidents Counsel (equivalent to a QC). Yet because EDS is obsessed in carrying out the fraud he suggests other parties whom he erroneously believes he can convince with some story.
PDS lined up the call like a ‘fluffer’. EDS came to the phone and his voice suddenly went onto the ‘fraudulent whisper’ setting.
EDS – “We saw the psychiatrist yesterday, last night, he said he has got another psychiatrist from Ungoda to see him as well and they feel he needs treatment. [Joe] feels that there isn’t a problem and that he wants to come home… Joe is having a heart condition and we met the cardiologist… see if there is any contraindications with the medicine… The [cardiologist] wants to make sure he does it the right way.. every single thing [Joe] will [scrutinize]… We have already asked that Cardiologist there is nothing… but seeing him via channelling tonight in 40mins time and ask him whether he can visit him if it is possible, if not he can give a letter… then he can give a medical report. And AFTER that is done a Court Order than be obtained.“
THIS IS IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE THAT CONFIRMS THAT THERE WAS NO COURT ORDER IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF THE 12/17 WHICH CONFIRMS THE FRAUD AND CONFIRMS THAT IT WAS IN FACT KIDNAPPING. THAT THEN RENDERED MY INCARCERATION ON THE PSYCHIATRIC FACILITY AS UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT.
EDS – “Now we need to find an ‘arms-length lawyer’ [so we can continue to work with you but it will be them as the visible person]… we need to get the Court Order because [Joe] has no insight which is the problem… because all [Joe’s] house we took photographs, all the house is locked [so the people coming] is all in his mind.“
All in my mind? Has EDS not heard his own conversations to third parties? ha ha.
This is another fraud as there are the audio recordings in which he knows that Francis Perera has the key and he confirms that fact to Gaya Pathikirikorale, his school friend for 50yrs. It therefore cannot be in my mind if I have seen people coming into the house, after Shihara the Owl Cat has alerted me to their presence in the middle of the night, I have photos of ‘before and after’ as well as videos, and we have audio evidence of EDS knowing that someone has the key!![insert evidence]
Does EDS not have the ‘insight’ to understand that if a third party has a key, then they can use that key to enter the property without breaking into it?
In fact I refer to this video which confirms that two hours before the 12/17 Fraud I discovered that the door locks had been modified:-
EDS – “[Joe] was brainwashed into believing.” that is false because I noticed the additional parties when there was no-one else residing in the house – as such how could I be brainwashed?
PDS – “What the psychiatrist said was that he will write a medical report and that medical report can be shown to a lawyer, then the lawyer can apply to courts saying that he needs treatment. Once we have that we can change his present place because if we send him to Ungoda that hospital is awful, so if we can get the Court Order then the psychiatrist can treat him at the present place which is a nice place.“
Two points – once again confirmation that there was NO COURT ORDER AT THE TIME which CONFIRMS THE FRAUD AGAIN – what is the defence to Aggravated Kidnap and Unlawful Imprisonment exactly?
PDS – “You must not let Joe know that we went to the lawyers through you..” – another instruction from PDS to the instructee. Why is Rienzie following the instructions of an adversary to my detriment if I am the client?
RA – “Don’t worry I will get that lawyer.“
PDS – “When the medical report is ready I will contact you.” – if Rienzie was not going to be involved then PDS would give the medical report to the new lawyer, not Rienzie who is clearly still being instructed.
RA – “The problem is that now it is the court vacation.. if this Order has to be obtained from the Magistrates Court then we can do it, there is a court vacation sitting. If it is the District Court then you will not be able to do anything until January.“
PDS – “So District Court we cannot, but can if it were the Magistrates Court… Normally which Court is the one?“
RA – “I think it is the District Court…once you get the papers you let me know.“
Yes it is the District Court as I have referenced the legislation above.
PDS – “Thank you very much for your help Rienzie I really appreciate.“
RA – “We’ll also pray for you.“
PDS – “Yes thank you I need a lot of prayers as I’m also getting stressed.“
RA – “Also you all are having a trying time to have to do this.”
PDS – “Having to come here from there, going through all this mental stress, we need your prayers very badly… we are also praying morning noon and night.. other things [Joe] speaks perfectly, his memory… he should have been a lawyer… from the law point he speaks incredibly accurately… but when it comes to ‘joe you need treatment’ he says ‘no I don’t think’ he as no insight.“
This is a textbook example of one of the goals of a MSbP sufferer:-
the text I wrote is:-
“Usually, the cause of MSbP is a need for attention and sympathy from doctors, nurses, and other professionals.“
RA – “He is thinking that the entire world is against him” – actually I don’t think that at all – obviously parties have been running a fraud against me and have got exposed and EDS and PDS are covering for them…
Please don’t generalise by attaching an incorrect label to me and then describing other features of the label.
PDS – “We had a vague idea but when this woman was putting more and more into his mind it became very obvious..“
Well if ‘this woman’ is the issue then put her into a Psychiatric Facility – putting me in there makes no sense if someone else was the causal agent!!
Unless the plan was of course to go through my stuff. Even an Australian Lawyer figured this out:-
At this juncture I refer to a quick video which I made after the 12/17 Fraud – despite EDS/PDS swearing blind that no-one came, where have these clothes come from?
It seems that when people don’t understand something in Sri Lanka, they immediately assume that they are experts on it and then failure to recognise their own limitations. That is classic Dunning-Kruger Effect and also ultracrepidarianism.
PDS – “When this woman came to work for him, he was so brainwashed that it became very obvious.” – more garbage PDS EDS and I joined Rienzie and his daughter for the dinner referenced above and PDS told her that my evidence was ‘fantastic’. So if PDS knows that she has seen the evidence and calls it ‘fantastic’ why is she suddenly forgetting forensic evidence and looking at qualitative information, as opposed to ‘quantitative’.
PDS – “I feel awful, [Joe] thinks that I have betrayed him by sending him to hospital and he wants to come home, but I know that if he came home he will never go back.“
Yes PDS is ‘feeling so awful’ that she is laughing about it.
RA – “In the evening he called me and wanted me to come, or Sashin to come and rescue him from the hospital [laughter].. I said ‘ok ok’ I’ll come and see him tomorrow.”
Sorry is there something funny with Aggravated Kidnap and Unlawful Imprisonment?
PDS – “Yes, if possible, if you can go Rienzie then at least he will know that you’re not on our side [more sick laughter, schadenfreude].“
RA – “Yes that’s right.“
So if PDS is clearly instructing RA to visit me, then the instructor is still PDS – this ties in with the early part of the call in which EDS/PDS are looking for an ‘arms-length’ lawyer to obfuscate the true instructee. All fraudulent and I really don’t know what RA is doing defaming me as well as breaching client confidentiality and facilitating a conflict to be created?
PDS – “Thank you Rienzie, that will be good…“
still being written…
Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)
Also in this series:-