Psychiatric Fraud - Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat
Enter more text here
Ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat
(Latin for “ignorance of the law excuses not” and “ignorance of law excuses no one” respectively) is a legal principle holding that
“A person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because one was unaware of its content.”
The rationale of the doctrine is that if ignorance were an excuse, a person charged with criminal offenses or a subject of a civil lawsuit would merely claim that one was unaware of the law in question to avoid liability, even if that person really does know what the law in question is.
Thus, the law imputes knowledge of all laws to all persons within the jurisdiction no matter how transiently. Even though it would be impossible, even for someone with substantial legal training, to be aware of every law in operation in every aspect of a state’s activities, this is the price paid to ensure that willful blindness cannot become the basis of exculpation.
Thus, it is well settled that persons engaged in any undertakings outside what is common for a normal person, such as running a nuclear power plant, will make themselves aware of the laws necessary to engage in that undertaking. If they do not, they cannot complain if they incur liability.
Pseudo-Defences to Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat
Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Shutting the Door on a Pseudo-Defence
There were two types of pseudo-defences that Edward de Saram ("EDS") was attempting to run, the existence of which are both confirmed yet both quashed...
Mental Health Act of Sri Lanka
The Mental Disease Ordinance Chapter 559 is the current legislation, last updated in 1956:-
MENTAL DISEASES [Cap.559 Ordinances Nos. 1 of 1873. 3 of 1882, 3 of 1883. 2 of 1889. 13 of 1905. 16 of 1919 , 3 of 1940. 13 of 1940. I1 o...
All Eleven Pages
Page 01 – Key Areas
To even START the process under the Mental Diseases Ordinance requires a WRITTEN APPLICATION. As such Edward de Saram (“EDS”) going around telling people that which to write and bribing them into falsifying medical reports means unavoidable invalidation from the outset.
PERHAPS HE SHOULD HAVE ASKED THEM TO WRITE AN APPLICATION INSTEAD – HA HA!
“Any officer of the police force, or grama seva nilhadari, or any private person having reason to believe that a person is of unsound mind, may apply in writing to the District Court having jurisdiction over the place in which such person so suspected is found, that his state of mind be inquired into.
An application by a private person should be accompanied by a certificate from a medical practitioner that the person so suspected has been under his observation and that he believes him to be of unsound mind.”
Issue 01 – There was no written application by anyone
Issue 02 – No Medical Practitioner produced a medical certificate because…
Issue 03 – I was not under the care of any medical practitioner except a Consultant Cardiologist and he had no reason whatsoever to believe that I had a psychiatric problem 🙂
Even the last page confirms:-
Statements of Fact
The relevance of statements of fact is actually referred to my article:-
The Depraved State of Mind - Malice Aforethought
The mens rea for the offence of murder is ‘malice aforethought’. Malice Aforethought - n. 1) the conscious intent to cause death or great bodily harm...
in which I stated:-
In Cunningham 1982, the House of Lords was unanimous in its opinion that the
intention to cause grievous bodily harm constitutes enough blameworthiness to amount to malice aforethought.
(A) A defendant may be convicted of murder if it is established either (1) that he had an intent to kill or (2) that he had an intent to cause really serious bodily injury.
(B) Intention is A STATE OF MIND CAN NEVER BE PROVED AS FACT. It can only be inferred from other facts which are proved.
Confirmation of Unlawfulness
To provide evidence that an UNLAWFUL ACT HAS OCCURRED, I have to demonstrate that conspirators concerned KNEW of
ENACTED LEGISLATION WAS IN PLACE, AT THE TIME OF THE FRAUD
I do not need to demonstrate that they were fully aware of the minutiae because if they are AWARE OF THE EXISTENCE OF LEGISLATION then the BURDEN is on them to ENSURE THAT THEY COMPLY with it.
“THE MENTAL DISEASE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 559 IS THE CURRENT LEGISLATION RELATING TO MENTAL HEALTH…”
So it does not matter if the act is outdated according to practices in 2015, it is still the ONLY LEGISLATION IN FORCE.
The age of an act is not relevant – they can be updated if required, and the failure of legal draftsman to re-write and parliament to approve updates does not invalidate previously enacted legislation.
The UK Offences Against the Person Act 1861 is even older but does not make it outdated:-
Offences Against the Person Act 1861
An Act to consolidate and amend the Statute Law of England and Ireland relating to Offences against the Person...
Evidence of Prior Knowledge
Conversation between Newton Ranasinghe (“NR”) and EDS 20151212 – Excerpt
EDS – “The thing is this to formalise [things in relation to Sectioning], there is some legislation going through parliament, but at the moment there isn’t anything like Section 2, Section 3.”
[WHAT EDS IS CONFIRMING IS THAT THERE IS A MENTAL HEALTH ACT BUT ASPECTS OF INVOLUNTARY ADMISSION/SECTIONING IS NOT AVAILABLE.
AS IT HAPPENS THERE WAS NO BILL GOING THROUGH PARLIAMENT WHICH IS ANOTHER OF EDS’ LIES. NOTHING IMMINENT WAS OCCURRING.]
Conversation between Dulmini Jayasundara (DJ) and JDS 20151218 – Excerpt
DJ – “We have a Mental Health Act here.”
The Laws of the Land
So referring back to this article
Per Legem Terrae - Perversion of the Course of Justice via Political Psychiatry
20171026 UPDATE Under a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request, it is IMPERATIVE that ALL ACTIONS performed in the target country FULLY COMPLIES with...
JDS “First name, are you a police officer?“
PM – “Yes“
JDS – “I’m not going anywhere.“
PM – “WE WILL COME INSIDE AND TAKE YOU BY FORCE.“
[CLASSIC COERCION – DO WHAT WE SAY OR WE WILL ASSAULT YOU!]
JDS – “ON WHAT BASIS EXACTLY“
PM – “Medical Treatment” (I thought in the first video it was ‘Money Disruption’).
and then EDS states:-
JDS – “No, if you do that.. I will file a Fundamental Rights case.“
EDS – “that’s all right“. What we are saying is that you can get your laptop..“
CLASSIC PSYCHOPATHY – CONTINUAL AND BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE LAW AND EDS’ GRANDIOSITY IN THINKING HE IS ABOVE IT.
JDS – “I’m not going anywhere, please leave.“
EDS – “Who’s your lawyer?“
JDS – “I’ve already spoken to the lawyers, I’m not going anywhere.”
EDS – “You can file anything… BUT UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY…“
JDS – “I KNOW THE LAWS OF THE COUNTRY I SPOKE TO THE LAWYER JUST NOW.“
[EDS REPEATING ‘LAWS OF THE LAND’ TO TICK THE BOX FOR AN
MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE TREATY REQUEST “MLAT”
DOES NOT FOOL ME BECAUSE I KNEW THE ACTUAL ‘LAWS OF THE LAND’, HAVING CONTACTED A PRESIDENT’S COUNSEL AT THAT TIME!!
SO EVEN CONSIDERING BOTH EXCUSES FROM THE FRAUDSTERS, THEIR ACTS ARE BLATANTLY UNLAWFUL!
Page 02 - Key Areas
Page 03 - Key Areas
Page 04 - Key Areas
Page 05 - Key Areas
Page 06 - Key Areas
Page 07 - Key Areas
Page 08 - Key Areas
Page 09 - Key Areas
Page 10 - Key Areas
Page 11 - Key Areas
THIS IS SUCH A SAD PERVERSION OF THE COURSE OF JUSTICE WHICH IS PATENTLY OBVIOUS TO EVERYONE BUT THE PERPETRATORS THEMSELVES!
Sheffield Stealers - It's Dim Up North
"The worst thing about being a genius is that most people are not smart enough to appreciate it." - JSR DS [this is draft and I a uploading evidence...
Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)