Psychological Projection in Attempted Murder

By 8 October 2017Z UNCATEGORISED
psychological-projection-in-attempted-murder-joseph-de-saram-rhodium-linkedin

Psychological Projection in Attempted Murder (±x)

Published on 8th October 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
468

Enter more text here

I would like to start with an analysis of the forensic evidence first.

Inciting the Violence

The above video shows a letter that Edward de Saram (“EDS”) wrote in November 2015, and for some reason hid in the kitchen without giving to me.

He placed it in a packet of soup or something so that Chamaree Silva could find it – I do not cook and Silva was the one who was cooking in the kitched.

I am really not sure what type of parent does this type of thing (ie incite violence against me). Margaret Cunniffe does this as well, and it must be some Pathological Narcissistic trait 🙂

Screenshots

As can be seen I have obtained some screenshots from the letter:-

I will highlight some of the specific phrases, which confirm EDS’ psychological projection, EDS’ grotesquely stupid assessments and other ‘keyphrases’ in which he wants to ‘plant the seed’ for others.

“Adrian – works hard, appears to be dedicated and loyal to you, and works hard and diligently. Appears to be trustworthy.”

* * I AM NOT REALLY SURE ABOUT THE USE OF THE WORD ‘APPEARS’, AS ADRIAN WAS LOYAL AND TRUSTWORTHY UNTIL EDS’ VISIT AND ADRIAN’S RETURN FLIGHT FROM SINGAPORE WHEN SOMEONE OBVIOUSLY SAT NEXT TO HIM ON THE PLANE AND FLASHED A BADGE 🙂 – I KNEW AT THE TIME BUT I GAVE THEM ALL DISINFORMATION * *

“Perera – loyal trustworthy honest and genuinely likes you and us and will protect you.”

* * THE PART THAT EDS CANNOT GRASP IS THAT EDS ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETELY WRONG. FOR SOME REASON EDS BRIBED PERERA AND THEN PERERA USED THAT MONEY TO BUY THIRD PARTIES TO HARM ME. EDS GOT INVOLVED IN A MASSIVE MESS AND THEN DECIDED TO BECOME ITS RINGLEADER. AS SUCH EDS IS WANTING ME TO WHOLLY RELY UPON SOMEONE UNDER HIS CONTROL * *

Always on His Mind - Fraud By Omission

Background As part of the 12/17 Fraud Edward de Saram ("EDS") went around making disparaging remarks to all and sundry in order to fabricate a...

“Chamaree – she likes to talk engage in activities other than admin work, she likes to talk about her experiences and goes quiet when what she said is not correct.”

* * THIS DESCRIPTION IS ACTUALLY EDS DESCRIBING HIMSELF. IT WAS IN FACT HE THAT WENT AROUND LYING ABOUT ME AND MAKING DISPARAGING REMARKS * *

“You don’t need a housekeeper. Perera is there to do all the work and run errands.”

* * WELL PERERA DID NOTHING AROUND THE HOUSE AFTER EDS HAD BRIBED HIM, AND STARTED POISONING SHIHARA THE OWL CAT AND I * *

“Chamaree likes to delegate and sit and do nothing, or spend time cooking.”

* * IT IS IN FACT EDS THAT LIKES TO ORDER PEOPLE AROUND AND WHO REQUIRES MINIONS TO DO HIS BIDDING BUT EDS DOES CONFIRM HOW THE DELIVERY METHOD OF SILVA’S POISONING THROUGH THE FOOD SHE WAS MAKING FOR ME * *

“Let me tell you that I do believe from the explanation Adrian gave me but need to look for solid reason if I am going to talk to people. I just cannot say my son said and expect people to blindly take action.”

* * MOST PARENTS IN THE WESTERN CULTURE WOULD LISTEN TO THAT WHICH I HAD TO SAY, NOTWITHSTANDING THE FACT THAT I AM ALSO A FORENSIC EXPERT, BUT IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ‘SIMPLY DENY EVERYTHING JOE SAYS’ HAS ALREADY STARTED.

IN ANY EVENT ADRIAN TOLD ME THAT EDS WAS CONTINUALLY TRYING TO DEBUNK HIM. THIS THEME IS NOW ECHOED BY LAWYERS WHO THINK I AM IMAGINING THINGS AND EVERYONE HOLDS ME TO A MUCH HIGHER BURDERN OF PROOF – NOT A PROBLEM IN TERMS OF EVIDENCE AS CAN BE SEEN FROM LINKEDIN ARTICLES ALONE 🙂

THE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE SENTENCES DEMONSTRATE AN ATTACK ON MY CREDIBILITY – THE CALLS EDS AND PDS HAVE MADE TO THIRD PARTIES ARE SHOCKING AND UTTERLY DISGRACEFUL, DEMONSTRATING MALICE AFORETHOUGHT IN ADDITION. * *

“This is not the way things are done in Sri Lanka and if you are in S/L you need to confirm to its ways culture”

* * I HAVE NO DESIRE TO BE IN SRI LANKA AND ONLY LEFT SINGAPORE IN 2013 BECAUSE EDS CAUSED ME TO HAVE A HEART ATTACK. HOWEVER IT IS CLEAR THAT EDS IS PLANTING THE SEED OF ‘JOE HAS ISSUES’ AND THE ‘GROUPTHINK IS ALWAYS RIGHT’

HOWEVER IT IS IN FACT EDS THAT IS POLARISING PEOPLE AGAINST ME. * *

“Always remember before you charge on against ‘so called Spies’ when you travel, a restraint, neck lock by them will have you completely paralysed from neck downwards. I was alarmed by the way you were conducting yourself when you travelled whatever the reasoning you could get assaulted.”

* * FIRST AND FOREMOST SRI LANKA IS A CORRUPT COUNTRY AND NO ‘SPIES’ HAVE ACTUALLY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES. IF THEY HAD DONE THEN I WOULD HAVE TAKEN A DIFFERENT APPROACH.

SECONDLY I AM NOT SURE WHY EDS IS TALKING ABOUT ‘SPIES’ – WHAT EXACTLY DOES HE KNOW?

THIRDLY HE DID NOT LIKE THE WAY I WAS FILMING THE BLACK BABOONS HARASSING ME – THAT IS NOT MY PROBLEM. BUT EDS HAS DOCUMENTED THIS AND CONFIRMING THE DISTANCING BETWEEN HE AND I – ANOTHER SIGNAL TO THE GROUPTHINK.

AND FINALLY EDS IS PROJECTING PERFECTLY, EDS’ OWN INTENT TO (A) ASSAULT ME AND (B) CAUSE PARALYSIS FROM THE NECK DOWN – EDS IS IN FACT THE ONE BEHIND THE ATTEMPTED MURDER:-

REFER TO THIS ARTICLE AND LISTEN TO EDS’ OWN WORDS:-

A Real Pain in the Neck v3

The Staged Road Traffic Accident on 22 October 2015 resulted in significant damage to my cervical vertebrae and/or intervertebral discs causing some...

20151212 234006 Edward de Saram and Newton Ranasinghe

EDS – “[Joe] has an existing serious injury where his 3rd and 4th Cervical Vertebrae are pressing on the spinal cord, so if we drag him and go and he resists he will become paralysed…. so we have to be extremely careful how we deal with it.

AND THE SAME EDS ASSAULTED ME TOO:-

18 December 2015 – the day after confirming serious damage to my left eye

18 December 2015 – Even the red-eye compensation of the Galaxy Tab S struggled with the left eye injuries

01 May 2017 – damage is observable in both eyes over 500 days later, particularly the left one where I am losing vision. I have great difficulty seeing with eye either after 6pm and my computer screen work is a struggle at all times because I can’t focus. I have lost my original depth perception and am very sad about what has happened. To make it worse EDS and PDS keep lying about what they did…

I was tortured and Shihara the Owl Cat was kicked as well…

This is the place EDS dumped me after the beating where I was left on my own – broken fingers, face bruised, blood all over the place, and yet I had to keep things together for my sake, otherwise I would give the clowns some reason to keep me unlawfully incarcerated.

01 May 2017 – damage is observable in both eyes over 500 days later, particularly the left one where I am losing vision. I have great difficulty seeing with eye either after 6pm and my computer screen work is a struggle at all times because I can’t focus. I have lost my original depth perception and am very sad about what has happened. To make it worse EDS and PDS keep lying about what they did…

“Wrong taxi coming it is up to the person who ordered it to check.”

* * ONCE AGAIN IS SHIFTING THE BLAME ONTO ME OR MY COLLEAGUES DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE WRONG TAXI COMING IS IN FACT THE ISSUE. ALL THESE TECHNIQUES ARE USED TO SIGNAL TO THIRD PARTIES THAT ‘JOE DESERVED WHAT HE GOT’. * *

“Chamaree by asking you (as informed by her) to switch of phones, internet etc, is trying to cut you off from the outside world, and any friends she will poison your mind isolating you. When you are really in need of help they won’t be there as she would have got you to fall out with them.”

* * CLASSIC PROJECTION – THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT EDS HIMSELF HAS DONE, BY EDS GOING AROUND TELLING PEOPLE THAT I HAVE A MENTAL PROBLEM – THERE IS IRREFUTABLE FORENSIC EVIDENCE OF HIS ANTICS, AND HIS OWN VOICE HAS NAILED HIM. * *

“She is trying to dictate in the guise of threats etc and frighten you and make you dependent on her.”

* * PERFECT PROJECTION – EDS IS THE ONE WHO HAS DONE THIS NOT CHAMAREE, BY ALIENATING ME AND BRIBING THIRD PARTIES

Harassment Surveillance - Psychological Torture

I have published this series of Articles so that Linkies can see the true extent of Harassment Surveillance in today's world, as well as the degree

THIS ISOLATION TACTIC IS A SIGNATURE THEME OF GANGSTALKING * *

“Watch out Adrian and Perera she will try to..”

* * ACTUALLY EDS IS THE ONE WHO DESTROYED THE RELATIONSHIP WITH ADRIAN AND PERERA * *

“Remember the area you are living in her territory. When she cannot have a way then she can get you kidnapped and ask for ransom as she I believe mentioned about giving gold etc to you.”

* * IT WAS ONCE AGAIN EDS WHO HAD THE CRIMINAL INTENT TO FORCIBLY REMOVE ME FROM MY HOUSE AGAINST MY WILL [AGGRAVATED KIDNAP] WHICH IS DOCUMENTED IN HIS OWN CALLS WITH NXR:-

Abduction Ahead of Rendition

"I have a very particular set of skills, skills I've acquired over a very long career, skills that make me a nightmare for people..." Background As is...

EDS IS PLANTING THE SEED, ONCE AGAIN, AND THAT THIS IS WHAT EDS INTENDS ON DOING, UNDER THE AUSPICES OF ‘SPIES’ AND EDS TRYING TO BE THE BIG MAN AND ‘DELIVER ME UP’ * *

“Please be careful. We all love you and don’t want you to learn the hard ware and the hard way will be too late.”

* * EDS AND HIS VEILED THREATS FOOL NO-ONE. HIS USE OF ‘PLEASE BE CAREFUL’ IS A PRECURSOR TO ‘JOE GOT WHAT HE DESERVED BECAUSE HE WAS NO CAREFUL – OR HE DID NOT FOLLOW ADVICE. ALL THIS IS LAUGHABLE BY APPLYING LINGUISTIC TEXT ANALYSIS AND OTHERS TO WHAT HE HAS SAID AND HOW HE HAS SAID IT. * *

“Take the medicines yourself not anything given by anybody.”

* * AND AS EDS’ LAST HURRAH HIS PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTION IS TELLING ME THAT HE HAS THE INTENT OF POISONING WHEN HE RETURNS.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HE DID HIMSELF. * *

Die Hard - My Erection Saved My Life

Whilst my adversaries call me a dick, I do 'rise to the occasion' during investigations so perhaps there is an element of truth - ha ha! As I wrote in

20170924 094723

Self-explanatory – EDS has lied again in the description of the symptoms and deliberately omitted the fact that EDS was under a medical malpractice investigation and but managed to ‘tick all the boxes’ and get some medication which he then poisoned me with.

What has happened is he has ‘fabricated symptoms of schizophrenia’, and then obtained medication which will induce the symptoms, and then poisoned me with those drugs, and then incapacitated me, dumped me in a psychiatric facility and then got others to join his bandwagon – a sad fraud from start to finish and attempted murder can be demonstrated by his criminal antics at every step of the way, and the false exculpatory statements made afterwards to evade criminal culpability

Now the Psychology

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. [1] For example, a person who is habitually intolerant may constantly accuse other people of being intolerant. It incorporates blame shifting.

According to some research, the projection of one’s unconscious qualities onto others is a common process in everyday life. [2]

Historical precursors

A prominent precursor in the formulation of the projection principle was Giambattista Vico.[3][4] In 1841, Ludwig Feuerbach was the first enlightenment thinker to employ this concept as the basis for a systematic critique of religion.[5][6][7] The Babylon Talmud (500 AD) notes the human tendency toward projection and warns against it: “Do not taunt your neighbour with the blemish you yourself have.”[8]

Psychoanalytic developments

Projection (GermanProjektion) was conceptualised by Sigmund Freud in his letters to Wilhelm Fliess,[9] and further refined by Karl Abraham and Anna Freud. Freud considered that, in projection, thoughts, motivations, desires, and feelings that cannot be accepted as one’s own are dealt with by being placed in the outside world and attributed to someone else.[10]What the ego repudiates is split off and placed in another.[11]

Freud would later come to believe that projection did not take place arbitrarily, but rather seized on and exaggerated an element that already existed on a small scale in the other person.[12] (The related defence of projective identification differs from projection in that there the other person is expected to become identified with the impulse or desire projected outside,[13] so that the self maintains a connection with what is projected, in contrast to the total repudiation of projection proper.)[14]

Melanie Klein saw the projection of good parts of the self as leading potentially to over-idealisation of the object.[15] Equally, it may be one’s conscience that is projected, in an attempt to escape its control: a more benign version of this allows one to come to terms with outside authority.[16]

Theoretical examples

Projection tends to come to the fore in normal people at times of personal or political crisis[17] but is more commonly found in the neurotic or psychotic[18] in personalities functioning at a primitive level as in narcissistic personality disorder or borderline personality disorder.[19]

Carl Jung considered that the unacceptable parts of the personality represented by the Shadow archetype were particularly likely to give rise to projection, both small-scale and on a national/international basis.[20] Marie-Louise Von Franz extended her view of projection, stating that “wherever known reality stops, where we touch the unknown, there we project an archetypal image”.[21]

Psychological projection is one of the medical explanations of bewitchment used to explain the behavior of the afflicted children at Salem in 1692. The historian John Demos asserts that the symptoms of bewitchment experienced by the afflicted girls were due to the girls undergoing psychological projection of repressed aggression.[22]

Practical examples

  • Victim blaming: The victim of someone else’s accident or bad luck may be offered criticism, the theory being that the victim may be at fault for having attracted the other person’s hostility.[23]
  • Projection of marital guilt: Thoughts of infidelity to a partner may be unconsciously projected in self-defence on to the partner in question, so that the guilt attached to the thoughts can be repudiated or turned to blame instead, in a process linked to denial.[24]
  • Bullying: A bully may project his/her own feelings of vulnerability onto the target(s) of the bullying activity. Despite the fact that a bully’s typically denigrating activities are aimed at the bully’s targets, the true source of such negativity is ultimately almost always found in the bully’s own sense of personal insecurity and/or vulnerability.[25] Such aggressive projections of displaced negative emotions can occur anywhere from the micro-level of interpersonal relationships, all the way up through to the macro-level of international politics, or even international armed conflict.[20]
  • Projection of general guilt: Projection of a severe conscience[26] is another form of defense, one which may be linked to the making of false accusations, personal or political.[20]
  • Projection of hope: Also, in a more positive light, a patient may sometimes project his or her feelings of hope onto the therapist.[27]

defence mechanism is an unconscious psychological mechanism that reduces anxiety arising from unacceptable or potentially harmful stimuli.[1] Sigmund Freud was one of the first proponents of this construct.[2]

Defence mechanisms may result in healthy or unhealthy consequences depending on the circumstances and frequency with which the mechanism is used.[3] In psychoanalytic theory, defence mechanisms (GermanAbwehrmechanismen) are psychological strategies brought into play by the unconscious mind[4] to manipulate, deny, or distort reality in order to defend against feelings of anxiety and unacceptable impulses and to maintain one’s self-schema.[5].

These processes that manipulate, deny, or distort reality may include the following: repression, or the burying of a painful feeling or thought from one’s awareness even though it may resurface in a symbolic form;[3] identification, incorporating an object or thought into oneself;[6] and rationalization, the justification of one’s behaviour and motivations by substituting “good” acceptable reasons for the actual motivations.[3][7] In psychoanalytic theory, repression is considered as the basis for other defence mechanisms.[3]

Healthy persons normally use different defences throughout life. An ego defence mechanism becomes pathological only when its persistent use leads to maladaptive behaviour such that the physical or mental health of the individual is adversely affected. Among the purposes of ego defence mechanisms is to protect the mind/self/ego from anxiety or social sanctions or to provide a refuge from a situation with which one cannot currently cope.[8]

One resource used to evaluate these mechanisms is the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40).[9][10]

False Accusations

The false accusations were commenced by Margaret Cunniffe and then Chamaree Silva subsequently, all about some apparent ‘psychological problems’ – it is all one sad fraud and even some dopey UK lawyers have ended up getting involved with this FALSE NARRATIVE’

But this concept is actually a part of these types of operations, as Frederic Laroche found out:-

When there is insufficient supporting evidence to determine whether an accusation is true or false, it is described as “unsubstantiated” or “unfounded”. Accusations that are determined to be false based on corroborating evidence can be divided into three categories:[1]

  • An allegation that is completely false in that the events that were alleged did not occur;
  • An allegation that describes events that did occur, but were perpetrated by an individual who is not accused, and in which the accused person is innocent.
  • An allegation that is partially true and partially false, in that it mixes descriptions of events that actually happened with other events that did not occur.

A false allegation can occur as the result of intentional lying on the part of the accuser;[2][3] or unintentionally, due to a confabulation, either arising spontaneously due to mental illness[2] or resulting from deliberate or accidental suggestive questioning, or faulty interviewing techniques.[4] Researchers Poole and Lindsay suggested in 1997 applying separate labels to the two concepts, proposing the term “false allegations” be used specifically when the accuser is aware they are lying, and “false suspicions” for the wider range of false accusations in which suggestive questioning may have been involved.[5]

When a person is suspected of a wrongdoing for which they are in fact responsible, “false accusation may be used to divert attention from one’s own guilt”.[3] False accusation may also arise in part from the conduct of the accused, particularly where the accused engages in behaviors consistent with having committed the suspected wrongdoing, either unconsciously or for purposes of appearing guilty.[3]

Additionally, once a false accusation has been made – particularly an emotionally laden one – normal human emotional responses to being falsely accused (such as fear, anger, or denial of the accusation) may be misinterpreted as evidence of guilt.

So thanks to the foregoing garbage is how I have been labelled, in a similar way to Frederic Laroche:-

Conclusion

As can be seen there is a massive psychological basis to the antics of my adversaries – they thought they could break me with drug-induced psychosis, unlawful imprisonment, theft of evidentiary materials, defences and counterclaims, but

THEY HAVE FAILED MISERABLY AND LEFT A MASSIVE AUDIT TRAIL WHICH LEAD RIGHT UP TO THEIR FRONT DOOR.

And me recovering forensic evidence on a daily basis will utterly smash any case brought against me 🙂

The reason is my early identification of these issues, as well as specific training in how to deal with these scenarios – these are operational strategies that are invariably undisclosed to most people.

Given the overall objective is to damage me and my business financially, I wanted to highlight these types of attacks so that Linkies can correctly identify them, should they find themselves unavoidably immersed in a similar situation.

The case continues…

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP